Also missing from the study is any mention of experience-dependent brain plasticity. Why?
As prominent feminist neuroscientists have noted, the social phenomenon of gender means that a person’s biological sex has a significant impact on the experiences (including social, material, physical, and mental) she or he encounters which will, in turn, leave neurological traces.
Yet the researchers do not pay any attention to the gendered experiences (such as hobbies, subjects studied at school or higher education, or participation in sporting activities) of the young males and females in their sample.
This absence has two consequences. First, the researchers miss an opportunity to investigate whether gendered experiences might influence brain development and enhance the acquisition of important skills valuable to all. The second consequence is that, by failing to look at gendered social influences, the authors guarantee that no data will be produced that challenge the notion of “hardwired” male/female neural signatures.
deviruo liked this likewildflowerswegrow liked this
union-mage liked this
tommyholland liked this anatomy--jane reblogged this from brutereason
heyduchess liked this
motronnoo-blog-blog liked this
rapgodv reblogged this from meishuu
sonewaize liked this sortingout liked this
paddiewaffle liked this
callioscope reblogged this from ophelias-revenge
callioscope liked this
lionheart-star liked this
fembomb reblogged this from vulvapeople
scarlet-void liked this
sewer-mermaid-blog liked this
vulvapeople reblogged this from ophelias-revenge
vulvapeople liked this
ophelias-revenge reblogged this from 4thwavenow
lilrubya liked this
stateofhale liked this
labryspirit liked this xaidread reblogged this from 4thwavenow
doug-kin liked this
4thwavenow reblogged this from meishuu antivan-surana liked this
chocochipbiscuit liked this
- Show more notes

